<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged early church</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>Let them cease, or be rejected</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/let_them_cease_or_be_rejected" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.589</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Andy</p>: </b><em>?Today is the feast day of the third-century bishop Hippolytus in the Anglican calendar. His work <em>The Apostolic Tradition</em>, probably written in 215, is one of our earliest guides to worship in the early church. It also contains this fascinating section on what occupations were considered out of bounds by those seeking Christian baptism—in the vocabulary of <em>Culture Making</em>, which cultural goods deserved the gesture of condemnation. If we disagree with Hippolytus (for example, about actors and soldiers), why do we disagree? Also notable, of course, is simply the fact that such lists were compiled, giving some indication of how wide a variety of people were seeking to convert to Christianity in the second and third centuries.?</em><br />
		
		<p>They will inquire concerning the works and occupations of those are who are brought forward for instruction. If someone is a pimp who supports prostitutes, he shall cease or shall be rejected. If someone is a sculptor or a painter, let them be taught not to make idols. Either let them cease or let them be rejected. If someone is an actor or does shows in the theater, either he shall cease or he shall be rejected. If someone teaches children (worldly knowledge), it is good that he cease. But if he has no (other) trade, let him be permitted. A charioteer, likewise, or one who takes part in the games, or one who goes to the games, he shall cease or he shall be rejected. If someone is a gladiator, or one who teaches those among the gladiators how to fight, or a hunter who is in the wild beast shows in the arena, or a public official who is concerned with gladiator shows, either he shall cease, or he shall be rejected. If someone is a priest of idols, or an attendant of idols, he shall cease or he shall be rejected. A military man in authority must not execute men. If he is ordered, he must not carry it out. Nor must he take military oath. If he refuses, he shall be rejected. If someone is a military governor, or the ruler of a city who wears the purple, he shall cease or he shall be rejected. The catechumen or faithful who wants to become a soldier is to be rejected, for he has despised God. The prostitute, the wanton man, the one who castrates himself, or one who does that which may not be mentioned, are to be rejected, for they are impure. A magus shall not even be brought forward for consideration. An enchanter, or astrologer, or diviner, or interpreter of dreams, or a charlatan, or one who makes amulets, either they shall cease or they shall be rejected. If someone&#8217;s concubine is a slave, as long as she has raised her children and has clung only to him, let her hear. Otherwise, she shall be rejected. The man who has a concubine must cease and take a wife according to the law. If he will not, he shall be rejected.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from <a href="http://www.bombaxo.com/hippolytus.html">The Apostolic Tradition</a> 16, by Hippolytus of Rome, ca. 215 AD</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>This violence God delights in</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/this_violence_god_delights_in" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.447</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Andy</p>: </b><em>?Wait a minute. We pray 'for the delay of the final consummation'? What happened to hoping to hurry up and have the rapture? As Tertullian explains earlier, "we know that a mighty shock impending over the whole earth— in fact, the very end of all things threatening dreadful woes— is only retarded by the continued existence of the Roman empire. We have no desire, then, to be overtaken by these dire events; and in praying that their coming may be delayed, we are lending our aid to Rome's duration." Fascinating.?</em><br />
		
		<p>I shall at once go on, then, to exhibit the peculiarities of the Christian society, that, as I have refuted the evil charged against it, I may point out its positive good.  We are a body knit together as such by a common religious profession, by unity of discipline, and by the bond of a common hope. We meet together as an assembly and congregation, that, offering up prayer to God as with united force, we may wrestle with Him in our supplications. This violence God delights in. We pray, too, for the emperors, for their ministers and for all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for the prevalence of peace, for the delay of the final consummation.
</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from <i><a href="http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0301.htm">Apology</a></i>, chapter xxxix, by Tertullian (Rev. S. Thelwall, trans.), 197 A.D.</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>When is a Text not a Text? When is a Reader not a ‘Reader’?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/when_is_a_text_not_a_text_when_is_a_reader_not_a_reader" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.448</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					
		
		<p>[S]ometimes Mark’s Gospel has been called the first Christian book, in large part based on the reference in Mk. 13.14 where we find the parenthetical remark, “let the reader understand”, on the assumption that the ‘reader’ in question is the audience. But let us examine this assumption for a moment. Both in Mk. 13.14 and in Rev. 1.3 the operative Greek word is <i>ho anagin?sk?n,</i> a clear reference to a single and singular reader, who in that latter text is distinguished from the audience who are dubbed the hearers (plural!) of John’s rhetoric. . . .  [N]ot even Mark’s Gospel should be viewed as a text, meant for private reading, much less the first real modern ‘text’ or ‘book’. Rather Mark is reminding the lector, who will be orally delivering the Gospel in some or several venues near to the time when this ‘abomination’ would be or was already arising that they needed to help the audience understand the nature of what was happening when the temple in Jerusalem was being destroyed. Oral texts often include such reminders for the ones delivering the discourse in question. So in fact it is not likely the case that the reference to ‘a reader’ in the NT functions like it would in a modern text.  The reader in question is not the audience of the discourse or document, but rather its presenter who knows the text in advance and can appropriately and effectively orally deliver its content to the intended audience or audiences.
</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2008/06/when-is-text-not-text-when-is-reader.html">When is a Text not a Text? When is a Reader not a 'Reader'? </a>," by <a href="http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/">Ben Witherington</a>, 22 June 2008</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>